PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 14, 20253 citations

Barriers and Facilitators to Program Evaluation and Dissemination: A Qualitative Study to Inform Implementation Strategies.

View Full Paper
LBLaura E. BalisSPShelly PalmerMIMaryan Isack

Key Points

  • MAIN FINDING: Identified barriers to program evaluation include data collection challenges and lack of organizational capacity.
  • KEY EVIDENCE: Interviewees reported insufficient organizational incentives and preferred ongoing consultation and support.
  • APPROACH: The study used semi-structured interviews guided by CFIR constructs to analyze influences on evaluation and dissemination.
  • SIGNIFICANCE: Findings inform the development of a technical assistance protocol to enhance evaluation capacity, supporting evidence-based interventions.

Abstract

Implementation strategies support the adoption, implementation, and maintenance of evidence-based interventions in community settings. However, strategies often conclude when funding ends, leaving implementers without assistance to maintain interventions. Implementation strategies focused on program evaluation and dissemination-factors that lead to program maintenance-are needed. The goal of this study was to understand barriers and facilitators to evaluation and dissemination in community-based organizations to inform relevant implementation strategies. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using an interview guide based on Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs hypothesized to influence evaluation and dissemination: complexity, self-efficacy, culture, available resources, leadership engagement, organizational incentives and rewards, external policies and incentives, reflecting and evaluating, and champions. The guide also queried implementation strategy preferences. A rapid deductive approach was used to analyze the data through a template aligned with the interview guide. Nine interviewees shared barriers around reflecting and evaluating (e.g., data collection challenges), available resources (e.g., organizational capacity), and organizational incentives and rewards (e.g., lack of recognition). Interviewees favored ongoing consultation, tools or plans, problem-solving support, and peer sharing. Based on these results, a technical assistance (TA) protocol was developed to include monthly consultation meetings and quarterly learning collaboratives to build capacity in project partner (UnitedHealthcare) grantees. Future work should evaluate the TA protocol for effectiveness in alleviating the identified barriers and improving program implementers' evaluation and dissemination capacity. If successful, this model could be used in other community settings experiencing similar barriers, ultimately leading to improved maintenance of evidence-based interventions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Balis et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689fc6912abb084d53ed26fbhttps://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251362163
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1What Works in Community-Based Interventions Promoting Physical Activity and Healthy Eating? A Review of Reviews2014 · 104 citations
  2. 2Making Dissemination a Two-Way Process1998 · 74 citations
  3. 3Food as medicine? Exploring the impact of providing healthy foods on adherence and clinical and economic outcomes2022 · 33 citations
  4. 4The High Obesity Program: Overview of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Cooperative Extension Services Efforts to Address Obesity2020 · 30 citations
  5. 5Using implementation strategies in community settings: an introduction to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation and future directions2022 · 69 citations