Analysis highlights the balance of rights and obligations in criminal law during geopolitical tensions, suggesting reforms to address economic crime.
The need to restore the multipolarity of the world has actualized the task of ensuring the proper level of protection of the legally protected interests of Russia, the rights and legitimate interests of organizations and citizens from socially dangerous encroachments, including in the economic sphere. The solution to this problem is objectively associated with determining the optimal balance between the rights and obligations of victims of crimes and persons who have committed crimes. Today, this area is characterized by many unresolved problems, including the issues of implementing state functions (including economic management in conditions of geopolitical tension) using the means of criminal law policy, ensuring a balance between humanization and tightening of criminal law norms, changing approaches to determining the severity of economic and corruption crimes in the changed geopolitical conditions. The authors formulated proposals for improving the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maksimov et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: