Mixed-methods research reveals gaps in Islamic piety and ethical practices in digital spaces, indicating significant shifts in authority.
This study investigates the ethical dissonance between ideal Islamic piety and digital behavior among Indonesian Muslims. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research draws on quantitative data from over 100 Muslim academics and qualitative insights from 15 in-depth interviews and digital ethnography. Findings reveal a gap between ethical awareness and practice in digital spaces, particularly misinformation sharing, viral trends, and uncritical engagement with religious influencers. Furthermore, the study highlights a shift in religious authority from institutional scholars to popular digital preachers, not always grounded in scholarly credibility. The concept of adaptive piety is introduced as a context-sensitive ethical response to digital challenges. The study contributes to contemporary Islamic ethics by offering a grounded framework that bridges normative Islamic principles with the sociotechnical complexities of the Global South.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jannah et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: