Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Calibration of the superconducting gravimeter drift rate in Zao and Fuji stations shows significant variance, implying further investigation is needed.
Abstract The instrumental drift of the superconducting gravimeter iGrav (serial number 003) was calibrated by comparison with absolute gravity measurements at two different locations and with different methods. At the Zao station, absolute gravity measurements were performed once a year to estimate the drift over four years. At the Fuji station, continuous measurements of absolute gravity were performed for two months and the data were directly compared with the iGrav data. At both stations, the instrumental drift was well represented by a linear function of time, but the drift rate obtained at Fuji was approximately twice as large as that at Zao. The cause of this difference is unknown.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imanishi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: