PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 11, 2025Pakistan journal of urology.

Advances In Minimally Invasive Surgery For Urolithiasis A Comparative Analysis Of Techniques

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ZKZafar Ahmad KhanAAA Akhtar

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Prospective comparative study evaluates ESWL, URS, PCNL, and RIRS effectiveness in treating urolithiasis, suggesting tailored approaches could enhance patient outcomes.

Key Points

  • ESWL removed 75% of stones up to 2 cm while URS and RIRS achieved 90% and 85% success for stones under 1.5 cm, respectively.
  • PCNL showed a 95% success rate for larger stones, with a recovery time of about 7 days, unlike ESWL, which had a faster return at 3 days.
  • This prospective comparative study involved 120 patients, categorized by stone size and location for precise outcome assessment.
  • Individualized treatment approaches considering stone characteristics may improve surgical success and minimize complications.

Cite This Study

Khan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a35ef30a429f7973328112https://doi.org/10.69885/pju.v2i02.83
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share