The YOLOv8-AHF algorithm improves defect detection accuracy in magnetic tiles, indicating better quality control in motor production.
Magnetic tiles are an important component of permanent magnet motors, and the quality of magnetic tiles directly affects the performance and service life of a motor. It is necessary to perform defect detection on magnetic tiles in industrial production and remove those with defects. The YOLOv8-AHF algorithm is proposed to improve the ability of network feature information extraction and solve the problem of missed detection or poor detection results in surface defect detection due to the small volume of permanent magnet motor tiles, which reduces the deviation between the predicted box and the true box simultaneously. Firstly, a hybrid module of a combination of atrous convolution and depthwise separable convolution (ADConv) is introduced in the backbone of the model to capture global and local features in magnet tile detection images. In the neck section, a hybrid attention module (HAM) is introduced to focus on the regions of interest in the magnetic tile surface defect images, which improves the ability of information transmission and fusion. The Focal-Enhanced Intersection over Union loss function (Focal-EIoU) is optimized to effectively achieve localization. We conducted comparative experiments, ablation experiments, and corresponding generalization experiments on the magnetic tile surface defect dataset. The experimental results show that the evaluation metrics of YOLOv8-AHF surpass mainstream single-stage object detection algorithms. Compared to the You Only Look Once version 8 (YOLOv8) algorithm, the performance of the YOLOv8-AHF algorithm was improved by 5.9%, 4.1%, 5%, 5%, and 5.8% in terms of mAP@0.5, mAP@0.5:0.95, F1-Score, precision, and recall, respectively. This algorithm achieved significant performance improvement in the task of detecting surface defects on magnetic tiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: