Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational study shows Pembroria® yields 47.1% objective response in metastatic cervical cancer patients, indicating a viable treatment option.
Background. Cervical cancer (CC) is among the four most common malignancies among the female population. For a long time, platinum-based chemotherapy was the standard of care and practically the only option available. However, treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic and recurrent CC remained poor. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly increased progression-free survival and overall survival in this group of patients. Currently, pembrolizumab is a priority option in treating patients with metastatic, persistent, recurrent CC with CPS ≥ 1 and is included in international and Russian clinical guidelines. Aim. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a pembrolizumab biosimilar (Pembroria®) in patients with metastatic, persistent and recurrent CC in the interim analysis of the PERFECTION observational study. Materials and methods. The study included a group of 51 patients diagnosed with stage IV CC. The treatment efficacy was analyzed using the Fleming method with the objective response rate criterion according to RECIST 1.1. Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs according to the CTCAE 5.0 toxicity scale. Results. At stage g2, an objective response was reported in 24 (47.1%) patients, which exceeded the target threshold (22 responses). 5 (9.8%) patients experienced immune-mediated AEs, a total of 6 cases, including 1 case of grade 3 AE. The overall objective response rate was consistent with KEYNOTE-826, but the AE rate was lower (34.5% in KEYNOTE-826). Conclusion. Pembroria® has demonstrated efficacy comparable to that of the original pembrolizumab product and an acceptable safety profile. Differences in the incidence of immune-mediated AEs associated with Pembroria® require further study, considering the duration of observation and sample size. The results support using Pembroria® in routine clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Саевец et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: