Analysis reveals giant flares triggered by cold to hot state transitions in discs around supermassive black holes, implying significant energy release.
We studied the thermal stability of non-self-gravitating turbulent α-discs around supermassive black holes (SMBHs) to test a new type of high-amplitude galactic nucleus flares. By calculating the disc structures, we computed the critical points of equilibrium curves for discs around SMBHs, which cover a wide range of accretion rates and resemble the shape of a ξ curve. We find that a transition of a disc ring from a recombined cold state to a hot, fully ionised, advection dominated, geometrically thick state is possible. Such a transition can trigger a giant flare for SMBHs with masses ∼ 10^6-10^8, M_⊙ if the prior geometrically thin and optically thick disc with convective energy transport surrounded a central radiatively inefficient accretion flow. An increase in the viscosity parameter α is a necessary condition for this scenario. This increase may be related to the fact that the magnetic Prandtl number increases and exceeds 1 during ionisation. When self-gravity effects in the disc are negligible, the duration and power of the flare exhibit a positive correlation with the prior truncation radius of the geometrically thin disc. According to our rough estimates, the mass of about ∼ 4-3000, M_⊙ can be involved in the giant flare lasting 1 to 400 years if the flare is triggered somewhere between $60$ and $600$ gravitational radii from the SMBH of 10⁷, M_⊙. The accretion rate on the SMBH peaks about ten times faster at the potentially super-Eddington level. An optically thick outflow with the comparable mass loss rate leads to anisotropy of the emission. At the beginning of the giant flare, the region near the truncation radius is heated to ∼ 10^5,K, and its UV/optical luminosity is at least ∼ 0.3-4 ,L_ Edd depending on the SMBH mass. The sudden heating of a cold disc around a SMBH can trigger a massive outburst, similar in appearance to what is proposed to occur after a tidal disruption event.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lipunova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: