Cluster-randomized trials assess patient navigation and external facilitation for improving cancer screening rates in Veterans, indicating differing impacts on completion rates.
Background Screening for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, specifically colorectal cancer (CRC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is often inadequately and inequitably implemented, leading to preventable morbidity and mortality. This protocol paper describes a study designed to compare the effectiveness of external facilitation with patient navigation across hospitals in the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Methods Two hybrid type 3, cluster-randomized trials will compare the effectiveness of patient navigation versus external facilitation for supporting HCC and CRC screening completion. Twenty-four sites will be included in the HCC trial and 32 in the CRC trial, cluster-randomizing Veterans by their site of primary care. The primary outcome of reach of cancer screening completion will be measured after intervention and during sustainment. Multi-level implementation determinants (i.e., barriers and facilitators), preconditions, and moderators will be evaluated pre- and post-intervention, using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-mapped surveys and interviews of Veteran participants and provider participants. Discussion Comparing findings in the two trials will allow researchers to understand how implementation barriers and strategies operate differently for a one-time screening in a relatively healthy population (CRC) vs. repeated screening in a more medically complex population (HCC). Trial registration This project was registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT06458998) on 6/13/24.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rogal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: