PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 11, 2025The Lancet34 citationsOpen Access

Extending the duration of endocrine treatment for early breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of 12 randomised trials of aromatase inhibitors in 22 031 postmenopausal women already treated with at least 5 years of endocrine therapy

View Full Paper
JBJeremy BraybrookeRBRosie BradleyRHRobert K. Hills

Key Points

  • Extended aromatase inhibitor therapy reduced breast cancer recurrence rates by 27%, suggesting significant benefits for women post-treatment.
  • Invasive breast cancer recurrence was significantly lower (RR 0.73) in those receiving further aromatase inhibitors compared to no additional therapy.
  • This meta-analysis involved 22,031 postmenopausal women with a median follow-up of 8.1 years, revealing important results for treatment duration.
  • Despite benefits, there was also a non-significant increase in risk of bone fractures (RR 1.35), indicating potential trade-offs in therapy.

Abstract

In postmenopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer, 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen substantially reduces 15-year recurrence and mortality; aromatase inhibitor treatment (AIT) is even more effective. We assess the effects of further AIT among women recurrence-free after at least 5 years of endocrine therapy. We conducted individual patient data meta-analyses of 12 randomised trials, including 22 031 women who had completed at least 5 years of tamoxifen, AIT, or tamoxifen then AIT, comparing subsequent AIT versus no further adjuvant therapy. Primary outcomes were recurrence of invasive breast cancer (local, distant, or new contralateral), breast cancer mortality, mortality from other causes, and all-cause mortality. Intention-to-treat analyses (irrespective of allocation adherence and stratified by age, nodal status, and trial, and censored at death from unrelated causes) yielded event rate ratios (RRs). Allocation to AIT versus no further treatment reduced recurrence rates by 27% (RR 0·73 95% CI 0·67-0·80, p<0·0001). This reduction was greater after previous tamoxifen alone than after some previous AIT, and greater in trials of 5 years of AIT versus no further AIT than in trials of 2-3 years of AIT versus no further AIT. After some previous AIT, allocation to 5 further years of AIT (with median 8·1 years IQR 6·0-10·0 follow-up after trial treatments diverged) reduced both recurrence (RR 0·71 0·61-0·81, p<0·0001; risk from year 5 to year 15 after diagnosis 11·6% vs 15·2%) and distant recurrence (RR 0·73 0·61-0·88, p=0·0010; 6·6% vs 8·6%); breast cancer mortality was reduced non-significantly (RR 0·90 0·70-1·15, p=0·40; 4·4% vs 5·0%). Tumour characteristics had no definite effects on the proportional recurrence reductions from year 5 to year 15, so the absolute recurrence reduction with 10 years vs 5 years AIT was greater for node-positive (risk 16·3% vs 20·1%) than for node-negative disease (9·1% vs 11·8%). Allocation to 5 further years of AIT increased 5-year bone fracture risk (RR 1·35 1·13-1·61, p=0·0009; 4·6% vs 3·4%). Non-adherence to allocated treatment was widespread (39·0% further AIT vs 37·6% placebo in the placebo-controlled trials). Allocation to 5 further years of AIT reduced subsequent distant recurrence rates by about a quarter despite substantial non-adherence. Longer follow-up would have been needed to help assess directly any effects on mortality. Cancer Research UK and Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Braybrooke et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a360e70a429f7973329718https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01013-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper