Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis reveals GINV and GYSVd1 alter sugar and acid levels in Welschriesling grapes, suggesting GYSVd1 has a greater negative effect.
This study investigates the roles of grapevine berry inner necrosis virus (GINV) and grapevine yellow speckle viroid 1 (GYSVd1) in regulating the soluble sugar and organic acid metabolism of grape berries and wine. The contents of soluble sugar and organic acid components and the activity and expression levels of critical enzymes of the soluble sugar acid metabolism pathway were measured in ‘Welschriesling’ grape berries and wine carrying the virus GINV, the viroid GYSVd1, and a mixed infection of both GINV and GYSVd1 (GINV + GYSVd1), respectively. The results show that the virus GINV and the viroid GYSVd1 decreased the soluble sugar and increased the organic acid in berries and wine. GINV decreased glucose content and increased malic acid content by regulating AI, NADP-IDH, PEPC, and NAD-MDH activity, as well as VvHT4, VvSWEET10, VvPEPC, and VvMDH expression levels. GYSVd1 decreased glucose content and increased malic acid content by regulating AI and CS activity and VvHT4, VvSWEET15, and VvPEPC expression. The results suggest that the viroid GYSVd1 negatively impacts berries and wine more than the virus GINV. Moreover, in the mixed infection with GINV + GYSVd1, the negative effects of GINV and GYSVd1 on soluble sugars do not seem to be observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: