PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 14, 2025ESMO Open17 citationsOpen Access

Exploratory subgroup analyses of EV-302: a phase III global study to evaluate enfortumab vedotin in combination with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma

View Full Paper
MHMichiel S. van der HeijdenTPThomas PowlesSGShilpa Gupta

Key Points

  • Enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab improved overall survival compared to chemotherapy in urinary cancer patients.
  • Overall survival was 19.1 months for patients with liver metastases receiving EV+P versus 10.1 months for chemotherapy.
  • This phase III trial randomly assigned 886 patients to receive either EV+P or chemotherapy, revealing consistent benefits across subgroups.
  • Results support enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab as the new standard of care for first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Abstract

In the phase III EV-302 study (NCT04223856), enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab (P) demonstrated superior efficacy and safety versus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC). We report the efficacy of EV+P in prespecified subgroups, including those defined by cisplatin eligibility status, the presence or absence of liver metastases, and metastatic disease sites. Patients with previously untreated la/mUC were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive either EV 1.25 mg/kg and pembrolizumab 200 mg, or gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin, all intravenously. The two primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Confirmed objective response rate was one of the secondary endpoints. Overall, 886 patients were randomized: 442 to EV+P and 444 to chemotherapy. Baseline characteristics were balanced across treatment groups. Efficacy and safety data for the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, along with PFS and OS data for cisplatin-eligible and -ineligible patients, were previously published (Powles et al. N Eng J Med, 2024). In this analysis, EV+P showed benefit across prespecified subgroups that was consistent with the ITT population. OS benefit in the EV+P arm versus chemotherapy was seen across all subgroups, including patients with liver metastases (OS 19.1 versus 10.1 months), patients without liver metastases OS not estimable (NE) versus 17.9 months, patients with visceral metastases (OS 25.6 versus 13.6 months), and in patients with lymph node-only disease (OS NE versus 27.5 months). In addition, confirmed objective response rate and PFS benefit with EV+P versus chemotherapy was seen across all examined subgroups. Along with previously published safety data, EV+P demonstrated benefit compared with chemotherapy across all prespecified subgroups, consistent with the ITT population and supporting EV+P as the standard of care for first-line treatment of la/mUC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heijden et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a3635e0a429f797332a86chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105544
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper