Retrospective analysis identifies gestational diabetes and maternal height as risk factors for macrosomia in neonates, suggesting targeted prenatal interventions.
ObjectiveWe aimed to identify risk factors for macrosomia in women with high-risk pregnancies, which will allow for early identification and timely intervention and improve the health of mothers and infants.MethodsA retrospective case-control study was conducted of pregnant women and neonates born at Shenmu Hospital in China between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2023. Cases comprised neonates with macrosomia (birth weight ≥4000 g), and controls comprised a group of normal-weight neonates (birth weight 2500-3999 g). Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictor variables.ResultsIn total, 10,253 cases with complete maternal and neonatal-related data were included in this study, with 1100 cases in the macrosomia group and 9153 in the control group. Male neonates (odds ratio = 1.636), gestational age (odds ratio = 1.726), maternal height ≥165 cm (odds ratio = 3.648), prepregnancy body mass index ≥28 kg/m2 (odds ratio = 2.733), excessive weight gain during pregnancy (odds ratio = 2.817), ≥2 pregnancies (odds ratio = 1.368), ≥2 prior deliveries (odds ratio = 1.285), gestational diabetes (odds ratio = 3.227), excess amniotic fluid (odds ratio = 4.592), scarred uterus (odds ratio = 0.693), gestational hypertension (odds ratio = 0.750), oligohydramnios (odds ratio = 0.262), and umbilical cord anomalies (odds ratio = 0.727) were all associated with an increased risk of macrosomia.ConclusionsWomen with high-risk pregnancies who have a height of ≥165 cm, ≥2 previous deliveries, prepregnancy obesity, and a scarred uterus should be provided with individualized prenatal care and delivery plans; for these women, monitoring weight gain, blood glucose, and amniotic fluid should be intensified along with targeted interventions to provide optimal care for this high-risk population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xue et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: