PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 15, 2025Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenOpen Access

Systematic Review of Complication Rates of Gender-affirming Breast Augmentation and Its Closest Analogue: Tuberous Breast Augmentation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

INIan T. NolanBABrandon AlbaTVTeresa Veselack

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Systematic review reveals low complication rates for gender-affirming breast augmentation and tuberous breast augmentation, indicating similar surgical techniques used.

Key Points

  • Rates of complications including infection and hematoma were below 1% in both cohorts, promoting safety in procedures.
  • The reoperation rate was 4.5% for gender-affirming breast augmentation versus 11.9% for tuberous breast augmentation.
  • Systematic review analyzed 29 studies, featuring 1617 patients for gender-affirming and 583 for tuberous breast augmentation.
  • Findings highlight that both augmentation types utilize standard surgical techniques, supporting routine use in practice.

Cite This Study

Nolan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a3654c0a429f797332aed3https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000006999
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share