This analysis shows evoked resonant neural activity correlates with therapeutic contact in dystonia, suggesting improved DBS programming.
Background Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeted to the globus pallidus (GP) can effectively alleviate dystonia symptoms. However, identifying optimal therapeutic stimulation parameters is challenging due to the manual programming process and the paucity of acute effects of DBS on dystonia symptoms. Objective This study aimed to investigate evoked resonant neural activity (ERNA) in the GP as a potential biomarker to guide DBS contact selection for chronic therapy in patients with dystonia. Methods In N=8 patients (N=9 hemispheres) undergoing GP DBS implantation for dystonia, intraoperative local field potential (LFP) recordings were acquired at resting-state (30 seconds) and during bursts of high-frequency stimulation delivered from each DBS contact. ERNA features (amplitude, frequency, and number of peaks) were measured and correlated with dystonia symptom severity, resting-state LFP spectral power, and postoperative chronic (12-month) therapeutic stimulation parameters. Results ERNA was consistently elicited by GP DBS but varied in amplitude, frequency, and number of peaks across individuals and stimulating contacts. Higher ERNA amplitudes were associated with stimulation at the GP internus/externus (GPi/GPe) border. ERNA frequency was negatively correlated with cervical dystonia severity (p<0.001) and resting-state alpha (8-12 Hz) power (p<0.05). In 8/9 (88.9%) hemispheres, the DBS contact that elicited the maximum ERNA matched the contact empirically selected for chronic therapy by expert clinicians through routine clinical programming. Conclusions Based on its correlation with dystonia symptom severity and therapeutic contact for chronic DBS, ERNA shows promise as an objective biomarker to improve the efficiency and efficacy of DBS for dystonia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: