This essay analyzes sports tanking's role in enhancing public deliberation within liberal democracy, highlighting critical discursive patterns.
The rise of illiberal structural and behavioral political cultures prompts communication scholars to consider alternative discursive models for maintaining healthy liberal democracy and promoting productive public deliberation. Our essay offers a novel contribution to that end. We introduce sports tanking as an intentional, systematic, and strategic practice of fielding non-contending athletic teams to lose games in the short-term to improve the chances of winning in the long-term. We analyze a range of mediated discourses to unearth a shared pattern across the rhetoric of sports tanking and liberal democracy marked by four points of formal correspondence: potentiality; pluralism; publicity; and prospectivism. We conclude by discussing the implications of this formal pattern for communication scholars, as well as fans of professional sports and a functioning liberal democracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winslow et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: