Retrospective analysis finds higher infection rates in kidney transplant recipients with elevated tacrolimus levels, suggesting careful monitoring is vital.
Introduction: Tacrolimus is a cornerstone immunosuppressant in kidney transplantation (KT), but its narrow therapeutic index necessitates precise monitoring. Early post-transplant tacrolimus trough concentrations (C0) are critical, as suboptimal levels can increase rejection and infection risks. This study evaluated the impact of C0 levels at discharge on early post-transplant outcomes in a large Korean cohort. Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis included 5293 KT recipients from the Korean Organ Transplant Registry (KOTRY) who received a kidney transplant between 2014 and 2019. Recipients were categorized into three groups based on C0 levels at discharge: <5.9 ng/mL, 5.9–9.5 ng/mL, and >9.5 ng/mL. Clinical outcomes, including serum creatinine (sCr), biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), and infections requiring hospitalization, were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and chi-squared test. Results: The BPAR rates were 22.5%, 20.9%, and 21.5% for the low, middle, and high C0 groups, respectively (p = 0.221). However, the incidence of infections requiring hospitalization was significantly higher in the high C0 group (28.1%) compared to the middle (23.9%) and low (21.7%) groups at 1-year follow-up (p < 0.001). In high-risk recipients, lower C0 levels correlated with increased BPAR rates (33.9% vs. 29.1% and 26.4%, p = 0.030). Higher intrapatient variability (IPV) between discharge and 6 months was linked to higher infection risk in all recipients and increased BPAR and infection risk in high-risk patients. Conclusions: Optimal C0 levels at discharge are essential to balance rejection and infection risks in KT. Lower C0 levels and higher IPV increase the risk of adverse outcomes, especially in high-risk sensitized recipients, underscoring the need for careful monitoring and personalized management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jun et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: