Empirical analysis reveals a negative interaction of digitalization and labor on logistics investment, suggesting high-skilled labor mitigates adverse effects.
The economic efficacy of logistics infrastructure is being reshaped by the dual forces of digitalization and the labor market. However, a new-era “investment return paradox” has emerged. Digitalization and an abundant labor force are theoretically positive forces, so why does their combination, when coupled with capital investment, paradoxically engender negative emergence that suppresses growth? Conceptualizing the regional economy as a Socio-Technical System (STS), this paper unravels this paradox by identifying and theorizing an “adaptive lag trap”. Using provincial panel data from China, we first provide empirical validation for this trap, identifying a significant negative three-way interaction involving labor quantity (coef. = −0.218, p < 0.05). We then demonstrate that high-skilled labor quality is the key to mitigating this trap. While its direct interactive effects are not statistically significant, our analysis uncovers a robust and theoretically potent pattern: a higher-skilled workforce systematically reverses the negative trend of the interaction effect. The split-sample test provides the clearest evidence of this pattern, showing the coefficient pivoting from negative (−0.0572) in the low-skill subsample to positive (+0.109) in its high-skill counterpart. Our findings establish that high-skill human capital is a necessary condition to circumvent the “adaptive lag trap”, underscoring the imperative for a policy shift from investing in the scale of labor to cultivating its skill structure within a co-evolutionary framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: