Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study finds no significant differences in outcomes between pharmacist and physician warfarin management, indicating further research is needed.
Background: The use of warfarin is complicated by a narrow therapeutic window, requiring close monitoring to prevent serious adverse events. Literature has shown that pharmacist-led warfarin management improves patient outcomes and decreases hospitalization length of stay. This study assessed the impact of the recently implemented pharmacist-driven warfarin consult service at 3 hospitals within the Cleveland Clinic Health System. Methods: This was a retrospective, multi-centered study which included 64 adult patients admitted to Cleveland Clinic Hospitals between June 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024 who received at least 3 doses of warfarin. Exclusion criteria included an elevated international normalized ratio (INR) upon admission, argatroban use, active cancer, or warfarin ordered by both managing services. Results: The primary outcome, rate of supratherapeutic INR values, did not significantly differ between groups (P = .84). In addition, the secondary outcomes including rate of subtherapeutic INRs, INR ≥0.7 within 24 hours, therapeutic INR at discharge, and major bleeding showed no significant difference. However, pharmacists were twice as likely to order an initial starting dose of <5 mg compared to physicians (62.5% vs 31.3%). In addition, physician-managed patients were observed more frequently for the INR ≥0.7 within 24 hours (11 vs 4 events). Conclusion: Overall, there was not a significant difference found in patient outcomes when comparing pharmacist versus physician warfarin management. Future studies with a larger sample size are needed to explore the potential differences in dosing regimens and its effect on the rate of significant INR elevations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wasowski et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: