Sequencing reveals mitochondrial genome structure and RNA editing diversity in Centella asiatica, indicating its evolutionary significance.
Background: Centella asiatica, a medicinally important species that is rich in bioactive compounds, lacks a characterized mitochondrial genome, despite nuclear and chloroplast assemblies. We sequenced and annotated its mitochondrial genome to elucidate its genetic foundations and evolutionary mechanisms. Methods: Assembly using Illumina short-reads and Nanopore long-reads was used to characterize the mitochondrial genome. Analyses included structural characterization, codon usage bias, repetitive sequences, horizontal gene transfer (HGT), collinearity, and phylogeny. The resulting tissue-specific (root, stem, and leaf) long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) profiles identified RNA editing sites. Results: The complete mitochondrial genome (249,777 bp, 45.5% GC) comprises three circular contigs encoding 51 genes (33 protein-coding, 15 tRNA, and 3 rRNA). Comparative genomics revealed synteny with the Apiaceae family of plants and evidence of HGT. Phylogenetic analysis resolved taxonomic relationships within Apiales. We predicted that 547 RNA editing sites would be identified in its protein-coding genes. Tissue profiling identified 725 (root), 711 (stem), and 668 (leaf) editing sites, with >71% concordance to predictions. RNA editing-generated cryptic promoters/terminators occur in mitochondrial core function genes (e.g., ATP synthase, cytochrome c reductase/oxidase, ribosome large subunit, and cytochrome c biogenesis), exhibiting a lower frequency in the leaves compared to the roots and stems. Conclusions: We provide the first complete mitochondrial genome assembly for C. asiatica, delineating its complex structure, tissue-modulated RNA editing, and evolutionary trajectory. This high-quality genomic resource establishes a foundation for molecular evolutionary studies and enhances the genomic toolkit for this pharmacologically significant species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: