Simulation reveals critical-adsorption conditions for polyelectrolytes on spherical particles, suggesting new insights on electrostatic interactions.
A polyelectrolyte (PE) chain in the vicinity of an oppositely charged surface can exhibit a discontinuous transition from the adsorbed to the desorbed state once the electrostatic attractive interactions are not strong enough to overcome the entropic losses caused by the PE-surface adsorption. In the context of PE–protein interactions, the heterogeneity of the charge distribution and the effects of a low dielectric permittivity underneath the surface are crucial. Studies of the combined effects of these two properties are very sparse, especially in the spherical geometry; we thus fill this gap here. We study the adsorption of PE chains onto spherical particles with heterogeneously charged surfaces, with the main focus on the critical-adsorption conditions and the effects of a low-dielectric core. Metropolis Monte Carlo simulations are employed, with the PE exploring the phase-space around the binding particle in the canonical ensemble. Two adsorption–desorption transitions are observed when the particle possesses a net charge of the same sign as that of the PE, resulting in nonmonotonic behavior of the critical charge density required for the PE–particle electrostatically driven adsorption. An increased affinity between the PEs and low-dielectric particles with variable heterogeneous charge distributions is observed, in contrast to the behavior detected for homogeneous low-dielectric particles. This higher affinity occurs when the Debye screening length in the solution becomes comparable to the dimensions of a patch of the opposite sign to the PE. A number of real-life applications of the considered PE–particle system is presented in the discussion, in particular regarding the properties of the complex formation between various PEs and globular proteins featuring a dipolar-type distribution of electric charges on their surfaces, such as insulin and bovine serum albumin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anhesini et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: