Green synthesis produces fe3o4 and ε-fe2o3 nanoparticles with unique optical properties, suggesting potential applications in photothermal sensing.
The synthesis of Fe3O4 and ε-Fe2O3 nanoparticles (hereafter referred to as Fe3O4 NPs and ε-Fe2O3 NPs, respectively) was conducted in an eco-friendly manner using FeCl3·6H2O as the primary reactant. The experiment was conducted by subjecting the sample to an aqueous solution of FeCl2·4H2O at a temperature of 80 °C for a duration of 45 min, with the inclusion of apricot kernel shell extract (AKSE) as a natural reducing agent. The synthesized Fe3O4 NPs and ε-Fe2O3 NPs were characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The optical properties of Fe3O4 NPs and ε-Fe2O3 NPs were examined, with the band gap energy estimated using the Kubelka–Munk formula. The results demonstrated a band gap of Eg (Fe3O4 NPs) = 2.59 eV and Eg (ε-Fe2O3 NPs) = 2.75 eV, thereby confirming their semiconductor behavior. The photoconductivity of Fe3O4 NPs and ε-Fe2O3 NPs was analyzed as a function of photon energy. For Fe3O4 NPs, photoconductivity exhibited an increase between 1.37 eV and 6.2 eV prior to reaching a state of stability. A comparable trend was observed for ε-Fe2O3 NPs, with an increase from 1.35 eV to 6.22 eV, followed by stabilization. Furthermore, the extinction coefficient (k) was determined. For Fe3O4 NPs, k ranged from 39 to a maximum of 300, while for ε-Fe2O3 NPs, it varied from 37 to a maximum of 280. A higher k value indicates strong light absorption, rendering these nanoparticles highly suitable for photothermal and sensing applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kouider et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: