This study investigates the comparative effectiveness of traditional and digital marketing strategies in attracting students to a satellite campus. Traditional marketing methods, including print advertisements, radio, and community outreach events, have long been used to establish trust and engage with local communities. However, the rise of digital platforms, such as social media campaigns and search engine marketing, has transformed how educational institutions reach prospective students. This research evaluates the perceived effectiveness of both strategies based on their accessibility, attractiveness, awareness-raising capacity, and clarity, as reported by 110 first year students through a structured survey. The findings reveal that traditional marketing remains effective in building community trust and reaching demographics less familiar with digital platforms, particularly older or rural audiences. In contrast, digital marketing demonstrates greater efficiency in engaging tech-savvy students, offering personalized outreach and broader geographic reach. The study highlights the importance of integrating both approaches to create a comprehensive marketing strategy, ensuring that diverse student populations are effectively targeted. Notably, traditional methods excel in fostering localized relationships, while digital tools enable real-time interaction and precise targeting, making both strategies indispensable. The results emphasize the need for institutions to adopt a balanced marketing approach. Recommendations include enhancing traditional marketing with modern elements like QR codes and linking campaigns to digital platforms while using data analytics to refine digital efforts for better engagement. This research contributes valuable insights for educational institutions, helping them optimize their marketing strategies to improve enrollment rates and maintain competitiveness in an evolving landscape. Future studies are encouraged to explore long-term impacts and cost-effectiveness comparisons of these strategies across diverse educational settings.
Janessa Marie Comajeg-Guray (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: