Tested the role of advection and receptive fields in improving satellite-based thunderstorm forecasting, showing significant effects after 2 hours.
Machine learning has a significant impact on severe weather nowcasting, with purely data-driven models quickly moving into the focus of current research over traditional physically motivated methods. Yet, recent work on radar-based precipitation nowcasting suggests that blending physical insight—like advection—with deep learning can improve forecast skill. In this talk, we will present our attempt to test how general this idea really is by applying it to satellite-based thunderstorm nowcasting for the first time.The central question we address is when and why advection should improve ML-based forecasts. Using a simple scale argument, we show that advection through optical flow algorithms helps preserve storm patterns within a model’s receptive field, which is critical for nowcasts at longer lead times. To test this, we trained convolutional neural networks to nowcast thunderstorms based on satellite imagery and lightning observations, with and without incorporating advected inputs.When considering average performance, the impact is modest. But once we break down the results by lead time and wind speed, a clear pattern emerges: the benefit of including advection emergesafter about 2 hours of lead time and grows with increasing wind speed, in agreement with our physical reasoning.Our findings highlight the importance of considering physical scales when designing and evaluating ML-based forecasting systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Metzl et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: