New method enhances accuracy of lightning distance estimation, utilizing sferics signals and multipath effects.
A single-station lightning location has the obvious advantages of low cost and convenience in lightning monitoring and warning. To address the critical challenge of distance estimation accuracy in this technology, we propose a novel physical time-reversal (PTR) method to utilize the full wave information of both the ground wave and the sky wave in the detected signal. First, we improved the numerical model for accurately calculating the lightning sferics signals in the complex propagation environment of the Earth–ionosphere waveguide using the measured International Reference Ionosphere 2020. Subsequently, the sferics signal with multipath effect is transformed by time reversal and back propagated in the numerical model. Furthermore, a broadening factor reflecting the waveform dispersion in the back propagation is defined as the single-station focusing criterion to determine the optimal lightning propagation distance, considering the multipath effect and the focus of the PTR process. The experimental results demonstrate that the average root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean relative error (MRE) of the PTR method for the lightning distance estimation in the numerical simulation within the range of 100–1200 km are 5.517 km and 1.21%, respectively, and the average RMSE and the MRE for the natural lightning strikes to the Canton Tower from the measured data in the range of 181.643–1152.834 km are 9.251 km and 2.07%, respectively. Moreover, the correlation coefficients of the detection results are all as high as 0.999. These results indicate that the PTR method significantly outperforms the traditional ionospheric reflection method, demonstrating that it is able to perform a more accurate single-station lightning distance estimation by utilizing the compensation mechanism of the multipath effect on the sferics. The implementation of the proposed method has significant application value for improving the accuracy of single-station lightning location.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: