Experiment shows potent immune responses from mRNA and rVSV vaccines in mice, suggesting strong candidates for SFTSV.
Background: Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV) is a highly pathogenic bunyavirus with a high case-fatality ratio for which there is no approved vaccine. Studies have assessed different vaccine technologies. However, few studies have yet assessed the immunogenicity of heterologous prime-boost regimens. Methods: Here, we compare a lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-encapsulated nucleoside-modified mRNA-based vaccine encoding the SFTSV glycoproteins, Gn and Gc, to our recently described recombinant VSV SFTSV (rVSV-SFTSV) vaccine in single dose, homologous, and heterologous prime-boost regimens in mice. Results: We show that all regimens protect from pathogenic SFTSV challenge and elicit strong long-lasting antibody responses. Furthermore, strong cellular immunity is elicited by mRNA-LNP immunizations and by heterologous immunization with an rVSV-SFTSV prime and mRNA-LNP boost. Cellular responses robustly polarized towards a type 1 response, characterized by high levels of IFNγ, TNFα, and IL-2. Immunization with mRNA led to a mixed type 1/type 2 immune response, as determined by antibody isotypes IgG1 and IgG2c. We found that homologous immunization leads to stronger antibody responses while heterologous immunization drives a slightly stronger cellular response. Conclusions: Taken together, the vaccine platforms described here represent strong vaccine candidates for further development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manzoni et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: