Background: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores are a widely used surrogate marker for atherosclerotic burden, but they do not fully reflect plaque vulnerability or coronary inflammation. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between CACs, coronary plaque characteristics, and perivascular inflammatory activity using advanced CCTA and CaRi-Heart® analysis. Methods: A total of 250 patients with no prior cardiovascular disease were retrospectively evaluated and stratified by CACs into three groups: 0 (n = 28), 1–100 (n = 121), and >100 (n = 101). Coronary plaque morphology, high-risk plaque (HRP) features, CAD-RADS scores, and AI-derived fat attenuation index (FAI) centiles were assessed. Results: Significant differences across CAC categories were observed for several key parameters. The number of diseased coronary segments increased markedly (from 1.39 ± 1.10 vs. 2.97 ± 1.57 vs. 3.94 ± 2.10; p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA). A similar upward trend was seen for segment involvement scores, HRP prevalence, and the proportions of mixed and calcified plaque components. Regression analysis demonstrated that CACs correlated significantly with segment burden (r2 = 0.2520), CAD-RADS (r2 = 0.1352), and the FAI score centile (r2 = 0.0568). Conclusions: This study highlights the limitations of CACs as a standalone risk stratification tool. Vulnerable and inflamed plaques may already be present in patients with low or zero CACs. Integrating CCTA with perivascular FAI mapping enables earlier detection of biologically active atherosclerosis and supports more precise clinical decision-making.
Matyas et al. (2025) studied this question.