Proposed network improves automatic target recognition in aerial view images, indicating enhanced accuracy with context guidance.
Although SAR systems can provide high-resolution aerial view images all-day, all-weather, the aspect and pose-sensitivity of the SAR target signatures, which defies the Gestalt perceptual principles, sets a frustrating performance upper bound for SAR Automatic Target Recognition (ATR). Therefore, we propose a network to support context-guided ATR by using aligned Electro-Optical (EO)-SAR image pairs. To realize EO-SAR image scene grammar alignment, the stable context features highly correlated to the parking patterns of the vehicle and aircraft targets are extracted from the EO images as prior knowledge, which is used to assist SAR-ATR. The proposed network consists of a Scene Recognition Module (SRM) and an instance-level Cross-modality ATR Module (CATRM). The SRM is based on a novel light-condition-driven adaptive EO-SAR decision weighting scheme, and the Outlier Exposure (OE) approach is employed for SRM training to realize Out-of-Distribution (OOD) scene detection. Once the scene depicted in the cut of interest is identified with the SRM, the image cut is sent to the CATRM for ATR. Considering that the EO-SAR images acquired from diverse observation angles often feature unbalanced quality, a novel class-incremental learning method based on the Context-Guided Re-Identification (ReID)-based Key-view (CGRID-Key) exemplar selection strategy is devised so that the network is capable of continuous learning in the open-world deployment environment. Vehicle ATR experimental results based on the UNICORN dataset, which consists of 360-degree EO-SAR images of an army base, show that the CGRID-Key exemplar strategy offers a classification accuracy 29.3% higher than the baseline model for the incremental vehicle category, SUV. Moreover, aircraft ATR experimental results based on the aligned EO-SAR images collected over several representative airports and the Arizona aircraft boneyard show that the proposed network achieves an F1 score of 0.987, which is 9% higher than YOLOv8.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: