Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analytical model reveals interactions that facilitate translocation of HIV-1 capsids via nuclear pore complex, suggesting implications for nuclear import mechanisms.
Recent experiments on HIV-1 capsid translocation through the nuclear pore complex (NPC) have demonstrated the docking of intact or nearly intact capsids at the pore, followed by translocation, with capsid disassembly occurring only within the nucleus near the site of integration. Given that the size of the capsid is comparable to the pore dimensions, these new findings raise questions regarding the energetics and dynamics of capsid passage across the significant entropic barrier created by the disordered FG nucleoporins (FG nups) in the NPC central channel. Here, we develop an analytical model for the transport of the HIV-1 capsid that considers the geometry of the capsid and pore, the free energy barrier due to the FG nups, and capsid-nup interactions. Our results show that capsid entry into the pore is favorable if the narrow end enters first, consistent with experimental observations, and that increasing the capsid-nup interaction strength enhances inward capsid flux. However, capsid-nup interaction alone is insufficient for complete capsid nuclear import and competitive binding by the nuclear factor CPSF6 to FG-binding sites on the capsid can serve as a ratcheting mechanism for full nuclear import. We show that nuclear import is arrested below a minimum CPSF6 concentration, consistent with experimental observations, and that pore dilation or capsid deformation can accelerate the translocation process. Our work explores the physics underlying a new perspective on HIV-1 viral genome nuclear import and provides quantitative explanations for experimentally observed phenomena while making testable predictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mishra et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: