This analysis reveals the strategies asylum seekers employ against legal im/mobilization, highlighting class influences and temporal layers.
Many asylum seekers in Europe—especially those with rejected claims or facing transfer under the Dublin Regulation—face legal forms of im/mobilization, including detention and deportation. In response, they may engage in strategies to resist or circumvent these constraints. While previ-ous research has shown that asylum seekers adopt such strategies, less is known about how they do so and who is positioned to adopt particular strategies. This study adopts a biographically grounded and class-sensitive perspective to examine the strategies asylum seekers employ to nav-igate legal im/mobilization. Drawing on longitudinal biographical interviews conducted in Ger-many and Italy, it explores how past experiences and future aspirations shape these strategies. The analysis foregrounds the temporally layered and classed ways in which individuals navigate legal im/mobilization—through strategies that draw upon resources accumulated in the past and carry traces of classed imaginaries of futures worth striving for.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Margherita Cusmano (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: