Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scoping review assesses racial disparities and gender representation in clinical trials for anti-VEGF treatments.
Background/Objective: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of irreversible vision loss. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the primary treatment for neovascular AMD. This study aimed to assess racial, ethnic, and gender representation in U.S.-based randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-VEGF therapies. Methods: A systematic PubMed search identified 19 eligible RCTs. Titles and abstracts were screened, and demographic data were independently extracted and cross-verified. Chi-squared analysis was used to evaluate disparities in participant representation. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBIS checklist. Results: Among 8003 participants across 19 trials, 92.3% were Caucasian. Asian, African American, Hispanic/Latino, and American Indian participants collectively comprised just over 5%. This underrepresentation of non-Caucasian groups was statistically significant (p < 0.01, df = 4) and not associated with study sponsorship. Gender analysis showed 59% female and 41% male participation, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.83, df = 1). Conclusions: Non-Caucasian populations remain significantly underrepresented in anti-VEGF RCTs for AMD. This raises concerns about the generalizability of trial findings to diverse populations. Future clinical trials must prioritize inclusive recruitment to ensure equitable, evidence-based care for all patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shafiee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: