Analysis of wind data from Sentinel-1, CARRA, and ERA5 in Iceland’s coasts shows disparities, implying enhanced hazard assessments.
This study evaluates three wind data sources in East Iceland’s coastal environment: the high-resolution Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)-based Sentinel-1, the regional reanalysis Copernicus Arctic Regional Reanalysis (CARRA), and the global reanalysis ECMWF Reanalysis v5 (ERA5). We focus on assessing the advantages and limitations of each dataset, especially considering their differences in spatial and temporal resolutions. While ERA5 aligns well with CARRA and Sentinel-1 offshore, it tends to underestimate wind speeds and misrepresent wind directions near complex coastlines and fjords, with Root Mean Squared Difference (RMSD) values reaching up to 3.98 m/s in these areas. CARRA’s higher resolution allows it to better capture coastal wind dynamics and shows strong agreement with Sentinel-1. Sentinel-1 excels in revealing detailed local wind features, such as katabatic winds in fjords, highlighting the value of satellite observations in complex terrain. By combining these complementary datasets, this study enhances understanding of coastal wind variability and supports improved hazard assessment in Iceland’s challenging coastal environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khachatrian et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: