Meta-analysis finds significant improvements in pregnancy rates and menstrual outcomes for patients with intrauterine adhesions, indicating potential benefits of stem cell therapy.
Background Intrauterine adhesions (IUA), a common gynecological condition, often result from endometrial injury and fibrosis. Traditional therapies like hysteroscopic adhesiolysis and hormone therapy show limited efficacy in endometrial repair and high recurrence rates. Stem cell therapy, particularly using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), has emerged as a promising alternative. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of MSCs therapy for IUA. Methods We systematically searched Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library up to January 2025. Using random or fixed-effects models, we analyzed outcomes including pregnancy rates, endometrial thickness, menstrual improvement, and safety indicators. Subgroup analyses were performed based on stem cell sources and transplantation methods. Results Twelve studies with 233 patients were included. Stem cell therapy significantly improved menstrual outcomes (RR = 34.54, 95%CI: [15.07–79.18]), pregnancy rates (RR = 21.86, 95%CI: [8.60–55.56]), live birth rates (RR = 18.00, 95%CI: [6.67–48.55]), and endometrial thickness (MD = 2.28mm, 95%CI: [1.60–2.96]). Subgroup analyses indicated that adipose-derived (MD = 3.34 mm) and menstrual blood-derived (MD = 3.62 mm) stem cells exhibited the highest efficacy. Safety data indicated mild abdominal pain in 5.15% and abnormal blood indices in 4.29% of patients, with no severe complications. Conclusion Stem cell therapy may improve the reproductive prognosis of patients with IUA. Autologous adipose or menstrual blood-derived stem cells via local injection are cautiously recommended. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm long-term safety and optimal treatment protocols. Trial registration The review protocol is registered on PROSPERO with registration number CRD42025643871, and no modifications were made to the information provided at registration. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , identifier CRD420256438.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: