Observational study links biomechanical and anthropometric factors to return-to-sport rates in ACL patients, suggesting tailored rehab strategies.
Background/Objectives: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) necessitates evidence-based rehabilitation strategies to optimize return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes, yet persistent re-injury rates and suboptimal performance persist despite standardized protocols. The purpose of this cross-sectional observational study is to examine the relationship between biomechanical, anthropometric, and temporal factors and return-to-sport outcomes. Methods: This cross-sectional study identifies biomechanical, anthropometric, and temporal determinants of RTS readiness in 81 recreational athletes post-ACLR. Outcome measures included anterior (A-SLH), lateral (L-SLH), and medial (M-SLH) single-leg hop for distance, single-leg sit-to-stand (SLSS), single-leg wall-sit hold (SLWS), and ACL-RSI. Statistical analyses employed Spearman’s correlations and multiple linear regression to determine the predictors of ACL-RSI. Results: There were significant correlations between RSI and Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) for L-SLH, M-SLH, SLSS, and SLWS (r = 0.27, r = 0.30, r = 0.44, r = 0.34, and p < 0.01, respectively). Among the functional outcome measures, multiple linear regression revealed that only SLWS significantly predicted ACL-RSI (β = 0.248, p = 0.037). Also, body weight (β = −0.233, p = 0.030) and postoperative duration (β = 0.292, p = 0.006) significantly predicted ACL-RSI. Conclusions: These findings challenge the primacy of limb symmetry indices alone, emphasizing the role of weight management, time-dependent neuromuscular adaptation, and multi-planar closed-chain strength in RTS decision-making. Clinically, rehabilitation frameworks should integrate personalized strategies targeting body composition and dynamic stability to mitigate asymmetric joint loading and enhance functional resilience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad Alanazi (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: