Phase 1 study reports promising early response rates in brain metastases patients, suggesting azeliragon may replace corticosteroids safely.
Azeliragon is an oral, brain-penetrating small molecule inhibitor of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), reducing neuroinflammation by inhibiting peritumoral edema/vascular leakage and overcoming radiation resistance. This study evaluates the safety and tolerability of azeliragon plus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) substituting for peri-procedural corticosteroids (loading dose [LD] and corticosteroid taper [CT]) and assesses potential efficacy of this therapeutic combination. ADORATION (NCT05789589) is a single center, open-label, phase I/II trial enrolling adults with confirmed cancer diagnosis, brain metastasis diameter of ≤2 cm, and who have discontinued corticosteroids for at least 5 days. In phase I, participants were enrolled into sequential cohorts, starting with azeliragon + SRS + LD; depending on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). 3 patients were initially treated with azeliragon at 30 mg twice daily for 6 days followed by SRS+LD within 7 days of starting drug then a continuous dose of 20 mg daily for at least 8 weeks. As no DLTs were observed, the second cohort (n=3) was treated with azeliragon and SRS (no LD or CT). For the 6 evaluable patients treated to 46 brain metastases, at data cutoff (1/8/2025), the median follow-up was 4.9 months (3.8-9.4 months) and no DLTs were observed. Early response rate (RR) was assessed at 8 weeks, with a per-patient RANO RR of 100% (partial response [PR] for all 100%), and a per-lesion RANO RR for all RANO-defined target lesions (n=18) of 100% (PR 95.5%, complete response [CR] 4.5%). For all brain metastases treated (n=46) the RR was 93.5% (PR for 69.6% and CR for 23.9%). Neurocognitive function batteries, symptom inventories, and quality of life evaluations remained stable during this assessment period. Azeliragon was safely substituted for corticosteroids in this phase 1 study with no DLTs observed. The early response rate appears encouraging and accrual to the phase II cohort is ongoing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kotecha et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: