Observational study indicates lower mucociliary activity in patients with long-term decongestant use, suggesting risks for drug-induced rhinitis.
Background: The prevalence of drug-induced rhinitis in the population ranges from 1% to 7%. The result of long-term use of topical decongestants in rhinologic conditions suppresses mucociliary transport, making them unsafe. Aim: To determine the effect of long-term use of topical decongestants on the mucociliary activity of the nasal mucosa. Methods: The study involved 80 patients with drug-induced rhinitis aged 18–45 years. All patients were divided into 4 groups: group 1 (control group) included healthy participants; group 2 included patients who used topical decongestants for up to 1 year; group 3 included patients who use decongestants for 1–10 years, and group 4 included patients who used topical decongestants for more than 10 years. The ciliary beat frequency was examined using high-speed digital video microscopy. Video of 8–10 areas with intact ciliary beating was recorded using a high-speed video camera (Huateng Vision HT-SUA133GC-T) with the highest resolution (1,280 × 1,024 pixels) and frame rate (245 frames per second) installed to replace one microscope eyepiece. The average video frame rate was 132 ± 71.1 frames per second. The resulting videos were converted into a sequence of frames using the Free video to JPG converter software. Then, the sequence of frames was used in the CiliarMove app to calculate the ciliary beat frequency. Results: The study did not show significant differences in the ciliary beat frequency of the inferior turbinate mucosa when using topical decongestants for 1 year and in healthy patients; whereas the ciliary beat frequency of the inferior turbinate mucosa in patients using topical decongestants for more than a year was significantly lower compared to healthy participants. Conclusion: We revealed correlation between the duration of topical decongestant use and mucociliary activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pokrovskaya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: