Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study demonstrates how tunnel construction influences groundwater inflow in karst regions, suggesting effective mitigation techniques for environmental protection.
Tunneling in structurally complex, tectonically active regions such as southwest China poses significant environmental risks to groundwater, especially in heterogeneous karst fault systems where conventional prediction methods often fail. This study innovatively coupled MODFLOW’s STREAM package (for simulating karst conduit networks) and DRAIN package (for tunnel inflow prediction) within a 3D groundwater model to assess hydrogeological impacts in complex mountainous terrain. The simulations show that an uncased tunnel lining causes significant groundwater changes under natural conditions, with predicted inflows reaching 34,736 m3/d. Conventional cement grouting (permeability: 1 × 10−5 cm/s; thickness: 10 m) mitigates the effects considerably and reduces the inflows in the tunnel sections by 27–97%. Microfine cement grouting (5 × 10−6 cm/s; 10 m thickness) further improves performance by achieving a 49–98% reduction in inflows and limiting the reduction in spring discharge to ≤13.28%. These results establish a valid theoretical framework for predicting groundwater impacts in heterogeneous terrain and demonstrate that targeted seepage control—particularly grouting with microfine cement—effectively protects groundwater-dependent ecosystems during infrastructure development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: