Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental analysis shows HVEF and composite preservatives improve rainbow trout quality, delaying spoilage.
To investigate diverse preservation techniques on aquatic products quality during storage, this study selected the rainbow trout as a representative. Total Volatile Basic Nitrogen (TVB-N), Total Viable Count (TVC), pH, and drip loss rate were used as key indicators. Preservation effects of four preservation methods were compared, including cold storage (4 °C), ice-temperature storage (−1 °C), High Voltage Electrostatic Field (HVEF, 3 kV/m) + ice-temperature storage (−1 °C), and composite biological preservative (CBP, 1.4% chitosan+0.05% lysozyme+1.3% tea polyphenols) + HVEF (3 kV/m) + ice-temperature storage (−1 °C). Results showed that the synergistic treatment with CBP and HVEF could effectively inhibit microbial growth. Samples under cold storage and ice-temperature storage had already decayed by day 10 (TVC:7.12 lg(CFU/g)) and day 12 (TVC:7.13 lg(CFU/g)), respectively. The TVC values of the HVEF+ice temperature and CBP + HVEF+ice temperature groups were only 6.32 and 5.89 lg(CFU/g) on day 12, respectively. On day14, the TVB-N of the CBP + HVEF+ice-temperature group was only 20.17 mg/100 g, significantly lower than others. This study demonstrates that the preservation technology of CBP + HVEF can significantly delay the spoilage of fish and extend the shelf life of rainbow trout by 4 days.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: