Clustering identifies six fertility types in 33 OECD countries, highlighting that integrated policies are necessary to improve outcomes.
This study investigates fertility divergence among 33 OECD countries from 2014 to 2023 using a two-step, data-driven framework. First, dynamic-time-warped K-Means and tsfresh-HDBSCAN clustering identify six distinct fertility trajectory types, from “high-welfare stability” to “ultra-low decline.” Second, Gradient Boosting Machines, Mixed-Effects Random Forests, and sequence-to-one LSTMs predict annual fertility using seven variables, including childcare spending, parental leave, urbanization, and ART access. Explainable AI tools—TreeSHAP and partial dependence plots—reveal critical thresholds: fertility rises only when childcare spending exceeds 0.8% of GDP and ART access surpasses an index of 0.55. However, these effects diminish above 68% urbanization due to housing-cost pressure. Notably, identical policies yield contrasting impacts across clusters, challenging one-size-fits-all approaches. Korea’s ultra-low cluster, for instance, shows limited returns without addressing housing affordability and ART coverage. The findings underscore the need for integrated, cluster-specific policy packages combining childcare, housing, and reproductive support to reverse fertility decline. This study offers a replicable ML-based framework for population policy analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: