This research demonstrates the chatbot's ability to assess anxiety levels in users, suggesting improvements for future recommendations.
Previous research on chatbots for pre-diagnosis and recommendation of anxiety disorders has been limited to therapy aids. Comparing NLU DIET and LogisticRegressionClassifier models, this chatbot system calculates anxiety levels using GAD-7, DASS, and STAIT/STAIS-5 methods along with Sentence Transformer (SBERT) for semantic similarity.Intent classification testing yielded 95% accuracy for NLU DIETClassifier and 99% for LogisticRegressionClassifier. The Dialog Model achieved 68% accuracy with TEDPolicy. Testing involved 35 randomly selected respondents, including students and workers. From their interactions, the SBERT recommendation model scored 30% MAP, 26% for the Indobert base and paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2 models.The average satisfaction and performance rating for the chatbot system was 3.7 out of 5. This research addresses the need for a prototype chatbot for pre-diagnosis and recommendation of anxiety disorders, with the best NLU model being LogisticRegressionClassifier at 99% accuracy and the dialog model at 68%. However, the recommendation system still has a low MAP due to the use of non-valid clinical data as references, suggesting room for improvement in future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winarko et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: