Retrospective analysis reveals troponin elevation does not predict adverse outcomes in PSVT patients, suggesting transient myocardial stress importance.
Background: Elevated cardiac troponin (cTn) levels in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) often prompt coronary artery disease evaluation, though the clinical relevance of this finding remains unclear. This study aimed to identify risk factors for cTn elevation after a PSVT episode and assess its clinical significance, including the role of coronary artery disease (CAD) and long-term outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on demographics, presenting symptoms, comorbidities, chronic antiarrhythmic medication use, tachycardia duration, admission systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), laboratory findings, and cardioversion method in patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with PSVT over a 4-year period. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the presence or absence of troponin elevation. Individuals with elevated cTn levels and at least one cardiovascular risk factor were further evaluated for CAD. One-year outcomes included SVT recurrence, rehospitalization, ablation, and mortality. Results: Among 120 patients with PSVT, 58 (48.3%) exhibited elevated cardiac troponin (cTn) levels. Independent predictors of cTn elevation included retrosternal chest pain, absence of prior SVT history, higher admission HR, and lower SBP. A heart rate cut-off of 165 bpm was identified as optimal for predicting cTn elevation (sensitivity 62.1%, specificity 72.6%). Of the 58 cTn (+) patients, 25 underwent CAD evaluation, with only 1 case (4%) confirming significant coronary disease. At one-year follow-up (n = 118), troponin elevation was not associated with increased SVT recurrence, rehospitalization, ablation, or mortality. Similarly, CAD evaluation in troponin-positive patients did not predict outcomes. Conclusions: Troponin elevation after PSVT is frequent but not prognostically significant. It is likely due to transient myocardial stress rather than CAD, supporting a conservative, individualized approach to further testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aletras et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: