Review categorizes C–O bond functionalization reactions by their mechanisms, indicating the role of transition metal catalysts.
In this review, we categorize C–O bond functionalization reactions according to their underlying mechanisms, encompassing both C(sp²)–O and C(sp³)–O bond activations. While nickel-based catalysts dominate the early and continuing developments in this area, recent efforts have expanded the scope to include a broader range of transition metals. Although molecular transformations catalyzed by these alternative metals are still in their infancy, they have yielded valuable mechanistic insights that are essential for future advancements. Moreover, it has become increasingly clear that traditional mechanistic frameworks are insufficient to fully explain the activation of inherently unreactive C–O bonds. This has led to a surge of interest in alternative activation paradigms, particularly dual activation strategies that exploit the synergistic roles of multiple catalytic components. By systematically summarizing the current strategies for C–O bond activation, this review aims to accelerate progress in the field and to offer conceptual guidance for the broader activation of otherwise inert bonds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: