PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 17, 2025International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education13 citationsOpen Access

How could GenAI work on in-service teachers’ knowledge building process? An empirical study based on epistemic network analysis

View Full Paper
HZHui ZhangQWQi Wang

Key Points

  • GenAI significantly enhances in-service teachers' information analysis and critical thinking, improving their knowledge-building process.
  • The study shows that GenAI boosts attention to information processing and evaluation in knowledge transfer tasks, particularly complex ones.
  • Analysis utilized epistemic network methods to assess the impact of GenAI on various learning tasks relevant to teacher development.
  • Findings indicate that while GenAI supports cognitive engagement, it shows limitations in fostering social interaction among teachers.

Abstract

Abstract In-service teacher professional development (TPD) is essential for improving teacher quality and student outcomes. Effective professional development equips teachers to actively engage in problem-solving and meaning construction. However, current online TPD often lacks tailored support, structured analysis, communication, and feedback, limiting teachers’ ability to engage in deep knowledge-building. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), exemplified by models like ChatGPT, has attracted significant attention for its potential in education, particularly in offering personalized feedback and fostering deep cognitive engagement. This study examines a large language model developed in China to investigate its impact on in-service teachers’ knowledge-building processes. Through analysis of frequency and epistemic network, this study demonstrates that GenAI significantly enhances in-service teachers’ information analysis and critical thinking. It also promotes greater attention to information processing, evaluation, and knowledge transfer during the knowledge-building process, although it performs less effectively in fostering social interaction and collaboration. The study further reveals that GenAI’s impact on knowledge building varies across learning tasks, with its support being particularly significant in higher-order, complex tasks. Building on these findings, the study offers recommendations for professional development for teachers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a36dec0a429f79733319cfhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00544-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Can Large Language Models Provide Feedback to Students? A Case Study on ChatGPT2023 · 264 citations
  2. 2Assessing individual contributions to Collaborative Problem Solving: A network analysis approach2019 · 126 citations
  3. 3Using Epistemic Network Analysis to Examine Discourse and Scientific Practice During a Collaborative Game2019 · 65 citations
  4. 4Models of Continuing Professional Development: a framework for analysis2005 · 797 citations
  5. 5A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education2022 · 228 citations