This analysis demonstrates robust energy system designs using quantum methods, reducing CO2 emissions in the food and cosmetic industry while addressing long-term operational uncertainties.
The industrial sector is a major contributor to energy-related CO2 emissions in Europe, making the transition to renewable energy solutions essential. Decarbonization strategies integrate renewable energy sources, power-to-heat technologies, and energy storage systems into existing production sites to enhance sustainability and flexibility. However, a key challenge lies in designing energy systems that remain robust under long-term operational uncertainties. Usually the design of each energy system component is discrete, as it is manufactured in a predetermined size. Classical state-of-the-art coupled design and operational optimization methods are based on continuous design variables, which might give sub-optimal solutions. This study overcomes this limitation by employing novel, computationally efficient robust quantum-classical discrete-design methods. Traditional approaches often optimize operations for a single year due to the computational limitations of operational optimization algorithms, leading to designs that lack robustness. By incorporating long-term operational uncertainties, this approach ensures that selected energy-system configurations minimize both CO2 emissions and costs while maintaining resilience to variations in weather conditions and demand fluctuations. Robust discrete designs which consider operational uncertainties show 12% less global warming impact (GWI) with 27% higher total annualized cost (TAC) compared to designs based on operational optimization without uncertainty. A novel quantum-assisted non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (QANSGA-II) shows accuracy up to 90%, which leads to 27% less computational effort than the NSGA-II algorithm. This novel method can help industries to search larger and more optimal robust discrete-design spaces for making decarbonization decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kansara et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: