Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation study shows appropriate reliability and validity of a ruminative thought scale, implicating its use in Jordanian contexts.
The study aimed to validate the ruminative thought style questionnaire in the Jordanian environment by extracting its validity and reliability. The study sample consisted of 500 bachelor university students from public universities in Amman. The study validates the ruminative thought style scale by translation-retranslation from specialists. The content validity, internal validity, and factorial validity were calculated. Also, for reliability internal consistency and split-half were extracted. The results showed that the scale has appropriate validity and reliability psychometrics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baha’ Suhail Shawaqfeh (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: