Population-based cohort study shows lower isoflavone intake raises mortality risk, suggesting health benefits from soy consumption.
Soy and isoflavones have been linked to various health benefits, but their associations with all-cause and cause-specific mortality remain unclear. We examined the associations of dietary intakes of isoflavones, soy protein, and soy foods with mortality risk in a population-based cohort study. We included 39,286 adults aged ≥ 19 years from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007-2015). Dietary intakes were assessed using the 24-hour dietary recall. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Dose-response relationships were evaluated using restricted cubic splines. Over a median follow-up of 8.5 years, 1,715 deaths were documented. Lower isoflavone intake was associated with a higher mortality risk, with a plateau in risk at higher intake levels. Compared with the lowest quintile of isoflavone intake (<1.3 mg/day), HRs (95% CIs) for all-cause mortality in the second to fifth quintiles were 0.72 (0.62, 0.84), 0.72 (0.62, 0.84), 0.76 (0.66, 0.88), and 0.74 (0.65, 0.85), respectively. For cardiovascular disease mortality, a significantly lower risk was observed in the third quintile compared with the lowest quintile (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.96). The highest quintile of isoflavone intake was associated with lower risks of cancer (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.99) and respiratory disease mortality (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.77) compared with the lowest quintile. Similar patterns were observed for soy protein and soy food intake. Dose-response relationships were nonlinear, with the lowest all-cause mortality risk observed around median intake levels (9 mg/day for isoflavones, 4 g/day for soy protein, and 33 g/day for soy foods). Our findings suggest that lower intakes of soy and isoflavones are associated with a higher risk of mortality in the population where soy consumption is prevalent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: