Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review highlights benefits of seed biopriming with microbial inoculants against pathogens in crops, suggesting sustainable agriculture practices.
From seed to harvest, cultivated crops face numerous biotic stresses, including insects, nematodes, and diseases, which significantly hinder their growth and vigor, resulting in substantial crop losses. In contrast to use of toxic agrochemicals, seed biopriming with microbial inoculants has emerged as an effective and eco-friendly alternative against pathogens and pests. Seed biopriming involves coating seeds with beneficial microorganisms that enhance protection and immunity against a variety of harmful pests and pathogens. These microbial agents colonize the seeds and establish themselves in the rhizosphere, reducing the impact of biotic stresses while fostering a healthier environment for plant growth. They are known to exhibit several mechanisms against pathogens and pests, like production of cell wall degrading enzymes, antibiosis, competition, induced systemic resistance, chelation of iron etc. Additionally, these microorganisms regulate phytohormone levels, further optimizing the physiological and metabolic characteristics of plants. This approach not only promotes robust plant growth but also enhances tolerance to deleterious bacteria, fungi, nematodes and arthropods, ensuring healthier crops. These interactions can further be well studied and expressed by using different omics approaches like metagenomics (of seed microbiome), proteomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics and differential gene expression. This review highlights the role and benefits of seed biopriming as a sustainable strategy to manage biotic stresses effectively, and the importance of omics for better understanding of complex processes during such interactions, contributing to resilient agricultural production systems and environmental sustainability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Puranik et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: