Analysis reveals that amygdala-hippocampal connectivity affects depressive symptoms in children, highlighting self-concept's role.
Amygdala-hippocampal connectivity is a promising area of study for an understanding of the neurobiological mechanisms of depression. In this study, we examined the association between amygdala-hippocampal connectivity and depressive symptoms in children with a specific focus on the subnuclei level. We then examined whether self-concept mediated brain-behavior associations. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was performed at age 7.5 years (N = 319), followed by self-reported depressive symptoms and self-concept between ages 8.5 and 10.5 years, using the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI-2) and Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale (PHCSC) respectively. We conducted multiple regression analyses to examine the associations between the amygdala-hippocampus resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) and CDI scores, first at the whole-region level and subsequently at the subnuclear level. Mediation analyses were then performed to explore the mediating role of self-concept in these brain-behavior associations. We observed a significant association between left amygdala-anterior hippocampus connectivity and CDI total scores, primarily driven by the left superficial amygdala. Further exploration at sub-symptomatic levels highlighted an association with negative cognition. Finally, self-concept mediated the association between left amygdala-anterior hippocampus connectivity and depressive symptoms in children. This study provided valuable insights into the associations among amygdala-hippocampal subnuclei connectivity, childhood depressive symptoms, and self-concept. Diminished left superficial amygdala-anterior hippocampus connectivity may serve as an early biomarker to identify depressive symptoms, particularly in children with negative cognition problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: