Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review demonstrates improved overall survival in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy, indicating significant subgroup benefits.
The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has introduced innovative therapeutic paradigms for the management of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC). However, the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with HER2-negative advanced GC/GEJC remain contentious. The comparability among different subgroups is not fully understood, necessitating the identification of optimal patient demographics and the exploration of potential biomarkers. This study identified 6 Phase III randomized controlled trials evaluating the first-line treatment of HER2-negative GC/GEJC with PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy. The primary endpoints include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR), assessed using hazard ratios (HR), relative risk, and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). Secondary outcomes are treatment-related adverse events and immune-related adverse events. Prespecified subgroups encompass microsatellite instability, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS), age, gender, previous surgery, primary location, liver metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, histological subtype, chemotherapy regimen, race, and PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. Incorporating data from 6 randomized controlled trials, this analysis included 6294 adult patients with HER2-negative advanced GC/GEJC. The combined PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy regimen significantly improved OS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI [0.75, 0.84], P < .00001) and PFS (HR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.70, 0.80], P < .00001), along with enhancing the ORR (relative risk = 1.22, 95% CI [1.15, 1.29], P < .00001). Subgroup analyses revealed benefits in OS, PFS, and ORR for patients with CPS ≥ 1, CPS ≥ 5, and CPS ≥ 10 when treated with first-line PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy, with higher PD-L1 expression levels correlating with greater efficacy. Furthermore, patients with high microsatellite instability exhibited a more pronounced extension in OS (HR = 0.35, 95% CI [0.21, 0.59], P < .0001). However, factors such as age, gender, previous surgery, primary location, liver metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, histological subtype, chemotherapy regimen, race, and PD-L1 expression in tumor cells were not predictive of an OS benefit from PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone. Regarding safety, the PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy combination led to a higher incidence of immune-mediated adverse events, though there was no significant difference in adverse events leading to death. First-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy surpasses chemotherapy alone in efficacy for patients with HER2-negative advanced GC/GEJC, particularly in those with CPS ≥ 10 or high microsatellite instability, with tolerable adverse events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hairoula et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: