Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework enhances predictive accuracy in urban visual perception by integrating visual foundation models and concept-based reasoning.
Understanding urban visual perception is crucial for modeling how individuals cognitively and emotionally interact with the built environment. However, traditional survey-based approaches are limited in scalability and often fail to generalize across diverse urban contexts. In this study, we introduce the UP-CBM, a transparent framework that leverages visual foundation models (VFMs) and concept-based reasoning to address these challenges. The UP-CBM automatically constructs a task-specific vocabulary of perceptual concepts using GPT-4o and processes urban scene images through a multi-scale visual prompting pipeline. This pipeline generates CLIP-based similarity maps that facilitate the learning of an interpretable bottleneck layer, effectively linking visual features with human perceptual judgments. Our framework not only achieves higher predictive accuracy but also offers enhanced interpretability, enabling transparent reasoning about urban perception. Experiments on two benchmark datasets—Place Pulse 2.0 (achieving improvements of +0.041 in comparison accuracy and +0.029 in R2) and VRVWPR (+0.018 in classification accuracy)—demonstrate the effectiveness and generalizability of our approach. These results underscore the potential of integrating VFMs with structured concept-driven pipelines for more explainable urban visual analytics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: